BANKRUPTED STATES = CON-CON & NEWSTATE CONSTITUTION
- 1 Comment
The strategically planned and forthcoming Constitutional Convention, which will address “a balanced budget,” is quite a cover story. Therefore, let us consider the truth behind this elaborate usurpation scheme.
As the country is failing in every direction – from the former individual in America to each and every individual state in the country, the total economic crash of EVERYTHING – and all converging at the very same time and as we speak – is, let us say, extraordinarily convenient.
Add this convenience to the fact that on March 27, 1969, President Richard Nixon divided the country into 10 regions via the Government Reorganization Act. Then with Nixon’s Executive Order 11647, the nation was divided up into 10 administrative regions on February 14, 1972 (Federal Register February 12, 1972, Vol. 37, No. 30), which also established the Federal Regional Council for the newly designed 10 regions. Now, why did former President Richard Nixon redefine the United States? He did so because the United Nations passed a resolution that the United States must reorganize into 10 regions.
Can you name your regional directors? Who are these councils, and where are their office buildings? Actually, you don’t know because they were not “elected,” nor are they mentioned on your tell-a-visions. Your regional councilmen are “appointees.” Can you tell me who appointed them to regional power? Bet you can’t. And the reorganizing of our former nation, achieved more than 25 years ago, and of which you know nothing, certainly suggests that “government” as we knew it changed a long time ago. With all this information now in hands, ask yourselves what would happen in the event of a really big, national “crisis?” What powers do your states hold, or for that matter, your counties or local governments hold – especially since they are all bankrupt AND have regional managers.
Add this to your plate: now that you know your nation has been redrawn and redistributed, what if I told you that a new constitution was written at the same time the country was divided into 10 regions? Ever heard of the Proposed Constitution for the Newstates of America?
In 1964, the Ford Foundation funded an outfit called the Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions to write a new constitution for our nation. After 40 drafts, a staff of 100+ people, and at a cost of 2.5 million dollars a year, a decade later (1974) the Proposed Constitution for the Newstates of America was finished. Mind you – a ten year, $25,000,000.00 project…let us therefore assume that the funding foundation(s) were very serious about this investment. And two years later in 1976, Mr. Nelson Rockefeller, who at that time was the president of the Senate, introduced HCR 28, which called for an unlimited Constitutional Convention – the perfect tool whereby to dissolve our current constitution and implant the handily written new constitution – and all without congressional oversight or public knowledge.
Didn’t go well for Nelson in 1976, but guess what? A new Constitutional Convention is right around our corners again – with 32 states requesting the Con-Con, and with only 34 required for it’s convening – and with most American states now totally, conveniently, bankrupt. Look at it this way: the Feds can not possibly bail out 50 states because they’ve already given all our money away – right? And we can’t pay taxes anyway because we have no jobs. Gosh…what can the Feds possibly do to rectify this horrible situation?
Dialectically speaking, they’ve had their answer of choice in the wings for decades. It’s called dissolving state, county, and local powers for centralized power. Gosh…it’s the United Nations mandate for one world government and regionalization of the United States – as commanded in the 1960’s. Do tell, folks…do tell.
The current economic “crisis” is the tool, the highly planned and patient tool, to set up the global governing bureaucracy for real and for certain with the second convening of the Constitutional Convention in the wings. The big wigs tried it before in 1976, and they are trying again, but this time having manufactured national bankruptcy as public fear-based appeasement.
I suggest you read your forthcoming constitution, which is also your forthcoming nightmare. Here is just a taste of your global privileges from your Constitution for the Newstates of America:
Article 1-A Sec.1 - “Freedom of expression shall not be abridged except in declared emergency.”
Article 1A Sec.8 - “The practice of religion shall be privileged.”
Article 1B Sec. 8 - “Bearing of arms shall be confined to the police, members of the armed forces, and those licensed under law.”
Research:
GovernAmerica.com
SweetLiberty.org
Etext.org/Constitution
1 Comments on this post
Trackbacks
-
Bill Walker said:
As usual the John Birch Society tells a pack of lies about an Article V Convention. Does any seriously believe that even if this “plan” were attempted that the states, who must ratify such an idea by 3/4th approval, would go along with it, thus giving up their own sovereignty not to mention their own political power? Never mind that it requires 2/3rd approval by the convention to even propose such nonsense.
And if what this article says is true, that these people are so powerful that they can create this new Constitution, why haven’t they done it? The author says they are waiting for a convention which means they are so powerful they can sweep all opposition before them to creating a new constitution yet are so impotent they can’t make Congress call an Article V Convention?
The ridiculousness of this article becomes really apparent when you know the facts of how many applications have been submitted by how many states and how long Congress has been required to call a convention.
According to public record, the actual texts of the applications of which can be read at http://www.foavc.org, all 50 states have submitted over 650 applications for an Article V Convention. The Constitution requires 34 applications from 34 states. Even these opponents to a convention admit if 2/3rds of the state legislatures apply (34), Congress must call a convention.
So, why no convention? Because Congress has publicly stated it has the right under the political question doctrine to veto the Constitution. The attorney of record for the members of Congress admitted in 2006 before the Supreme Court that a convention call is based on a simple numeric count of states, that the proper number of states had applied and that to refuse to obey the Constitution is a criminal violation of law. You can read about the lawsuit at FAQ 9.1 at the http://www.foavc.org website.
Please, this is a serious constitutional matter. Take time to learn the facts. Read the material on both sides. Check what references this article provides and then check the references at FOAVC. Don’t be misled until you’ve had a chance to look at the whole picture.
And remember this, what this author is saying is that the Constitution should be vetoed by the government meaning that what he says we should fear is what he is really advocating. Once you establish any part of the Constitution can be vetoed, all of it can be and by a government we all know has and will do it.
If the convention method of proposing amendments has issues, then instead of overturning the Constitution, why don’t we consider solving those problems instead and get about holding a convention to solve the issues this nation faces?
December 28th, 2008 at 3:15 pm